Friday, November 7, 2008

Oh Those Republicans

This is a piece that I will write straight from the heart. It will also be my last write-up on last Tuesday's election

After suffering a devastating loss last Tuesday, the Republican Party is said to be doing some soul-searching as to the causes of their defeat. They are trying to figure out how to rebuild the party after two consecutive election losses that led first to the Republicans' losing their majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2006 and second, the loss of the White House to the Democrats with the victory of President-elect Barack Obama.

Although Mr. Obama scored a landslide victory over Senator John McCain, the Republicans are consoling themselves with the thought that even though Mr. Obama garnered 53% of the popular vote as compared to Senator McCain's 46%, Senator McCain's percentage of the total vote was still higher than the 43% former President Bill Clinton got when Mr. Clinton won the Presidency in the 1992 elections.

The Republicans still think that they can win the electorate back in future election by emphasizing conservative principles such as their beliefs in smaller and more efficient government, lower taxes, a strong military, meritocracy, strong religious and family values, and the capitalist economic system.

On the surface, those conservative principles the Republicans espouse ought to be attractive to a lot of people, especially immigrants who want to start a new life in a new country. But the problem with the Republicans is that there are sectors within the Republican Party who are racist and stridently anti-immigrant. Although these bigots (let's call a spade a spade here) do not make up a majority of the Republican membership, their voices were loud enough and their numbers were big enough to prevent President George W. Bush and Senator McCain from enacting a comprehensive immigration reform law back in 2006.

President Bush, in the early part of this decade, realized the need for the Republican Party to be a more racially inclusive political party. For all his imperfections, Mr. Bush was a politically moderate man who wanted more minority groups to be welcomed and represented within the Republican Party. He knew and understood that a lot of minority groups share the same socially conservative and pro-family values that the Republican Party stands for. Thus, Mr. Bush worked hard to win the support of minority groups and promised them that he will work to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill into law.

The bill was basically aimed at attracting illegal aliens to come out and register with the government authorities. Mr. Bush wanted the illegal aliens to pay taxes on income earned in the US but in exchange, they could gain a path towards permanent residency. His proposal enjoyed widespread support among Democrats and moderate Republicans such as Senator McCain. However, Mr. Bush ran into stiff resistance from members of his own party, specifically Republican congressmen who hid their racism under the guise of respect for the rule of law.

To make a long story short, the bill was defeated in Congress because of the hardline stance these anti-immigrant Republicans took. As a result, minority groups, especially the Hispanics, who helped Mr. Bush win reelection in 2004, switched their support to the Democrats and thus contributed significantly to Mr. McCain's defeat against Mr. Obama.

The irony from last Tuesday was that the Hispanics and other minority groups punished the Republican Party by voting against Mr. McCain, the man who helped Mr. Bush champion the ill-fated comprehensive immigration reform law. In addition, the Republicans are rapidly losing their hold in the most racially diverse areas of the nation. In the Northeastern region of the US where I live, with the lone exception of Maine, all Northeastern states (New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticutt, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia) are now represented by Democrats in the US Senate. The same is true of the West Coast. As of last Tuesday's election, the entire West Coast region (made up of the states of Washington, Oregon, and California) are now likewise represented by Democrats in the US Senate.

If the Republicans seriously want to win back both the White House and Congress in the coming years, they need to reassess their attitudes and policies towards ethnic minorities. The demographics in the US are changing dramatically. According to the latest figures from the US Census Bureau, 44% of American children today are ethnic minorities, almost a 1-to-1 parity. The bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will make up 46% of the US population, down from 68% today.

But in spite of such statistics and projections, a number of Republicans still continue to ignore the immigrant community. They still pursue policies seemingly under the assumption that what worked well for them in the past in a predominantly white America will continue to work for them in the future.

What a lot of Republican politicians and their followers fail to realize is that by continuing to ignore immigrants and minorities, the Republicans run the risk of being reduced to a regional political party and worse, probably an irrelevant one in the years to come. Over the last few days, I read several reports on the web and on newspapers as to how the Republicans plan to revive their party. However, most of the Republicans' plans still fail to mention the urgent need to reach out to minorities. Some voices of reason and moderation within the party see the need to do so but for now, it seems that the Republican Party leadership is still clinging to their old ways.

I said at the beginning of this piece that I was writing it straight from the heart. I did so because of feelings of anger and sadness for the very sorry state the party now finds itself in. This Republican Party was a party that was once led by the great Abraham Lincoln. This Republican Party was the party that had once fought so hard to free the slaves and effectively ended slavery. It is highly ironic then that a hundred fifty years later, due to the narrow-mindedness and bigotry of some groups within it, this Republican Party is a party that now finds itself shunned by the very people it once fought so hard to free.

29 responses:

BlogusVox said...

Ironic indeed! If that happened in the Philippines, they don't have to revive the party. All they have to do is switched side. It's cheaper but, balimbing nga lang!

Now let's see how this new administration is going to assimilate socialism and capitalist views. Me think its like trying to unite seamlessly The Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. It's hard, but possible and it will take time as Stephen Hawkins said.

Rudy said...

True, McCains's percentage was higher than that of Clinton's but that was only because the voter turnout then wasn't as huge as it was last Tuesday.

The republicans were such sore losers. You can even hear loud boos during McCain's speech... tsk tsk.

bwzone said...

I think McCain's defeat has a lot to do with the state of the economy which was for the most part blamed on President Bush. When someone loses his house to foreclosure or loses his job because of the bankruptcies fueled by the subprime meltdown, it is hard to get votes from these people if you are of the same political stripe as Bush. Even those who lost the net worth of their investments or retirement portfolio are pissed with the Republican leasdership.

In retrospect, Obama was locked in to win but we shall see whether he walks his election talk.

bwzone said...

"even those who lost a third of the net worth of their investments"

princess_dyanie said...

happy happy coz Obama won! :)

Everlito (ever) Villacruz said...

we will wait,and i think still waiting for it...first time black president in a history of america.

atticus said...

you are right. even one of mccain's closest friends warned him against listening to the so-called conservatives, and trying to make them happy.

that friend later on abandoned mccain because of the dissonance in his campaign.

very well-written and insightful. you're very brave, writing it.

mirage2g said...

Months ago, Austria had its election too (a parliament form of government). And there are some parties who openly say they are against immigrants (well, select immigrants) hopefully, not targeted to Filipinos =D - Unfortunately, one of those party's leader, Jorg Haider died shortly after the election =D

Anyway, voting age was lowered to 16yrs...a move of the government to allow more voters...particularly the younger citizens whose 'racist mentallity' is stronger than the older people. (them being in schools along with immigrants). I guess no matter where or who, discrimination is something that runs in our blood...in the blood of imperfect humans.

--I read from the local paper Wednesday morning: "Bush says to successor: Viel Spass!" (Have fun!) How can Obama have fun handling an economy that is at its lowest, with wars Bush started and left behind, never forget too that though he is president, some would still see him as just 'black.' Ironic.

the donG said...

i really learned a lot from this post. i have less idea of the different government systems in the US. i particularly like how you tackled the pros and cons of having a republic kind of system. i like the pros but knowing that it raises racist issues, then it's indeed the bad side of that.

Panaderos said...

Blogusvox,

Yeah, balimbingism still rules the day in Philippine politics. Very few politicians have been principled enough to remain loyal to a political party.

As for Mr. Obama, I hope he governs from the center because that's where a majority of Americans are. If he goes too far to the left, he will run into trouble early.

Panaderos said...

Rudy,

The Republicans have a lot of thinking and soul-searching to do. Ever since I wrote this entry, I've been watching the news and reading the papers and still, most of them think that by simply sticking to their conservative values that they will be able to attract new voters.

A lot of them still don't get it. The face of America is changing and if they remain in denial, they will certainly find themselves slowly but surely marginalized from the political mainstream.

Panaderos said...

BW,

True. Economic issues and McCain's failure to articulate and sell his economic proposals doomed his candidacy more than anything else. He also ran a very undisciplined campaign that failed to stick to a single message and failed to show voters what a McCain presidency would look like.

Panaderos said...

Princess Dyanie,

Congratulations. :)

Panaderos said...

Ever,

That's true. Let's all wait and see how Mr. Obama will perform as President.

Panaderos said...

Atticus,

McCain, unlike Bush, did not command the loyalty of the conservative base. Thus, he ended up changing his stand on critical issues such as immigration just to earn the loyalty and votes of the hardline conservatives within the Republican Party.

Thank you very much for the compliment. :)

Panaderos said...

Mirage2g,

I read about the elections there and I believe Hader was a closet homosexual, a fact that was hidden from the Austrian people.

I just hope that the young people in Austria don't neglect to study the country's Nazi past. I'm quite concerned whenever I read of neo-Nazi activities in both Germany and Austria.

Panaderos said...

Dong,

It is awful that the Republican Party brand is getting dragged down to the muck by the narrow-minded racists within it. Simply sticking to conservative values won't cut it. They need to win a substantial portion of the minority groups to have a chance of winning elections in the future.

luna miranda said...

i read howie severino's blog a week before the elections--- kahindik-hindik ang pagka-racist ng maraming pinoy. the republican party is indeed deteriorating...the reason why many independent voters didn't vote for mc cain. mc cain would be a great president, if only he's not a republican.

Panaderos said...

Luna Miranda,

True. A number of our own are guilty of the same sins. I know of quite a number of Filipinos who voted for Democrats in past Presidential elections but this time refused to vote for Obama simply because of his skin color.

It's sad and it makes me wonder whether or not a Filipino Muslim or a Filipino-Chinese stand a very good chance of winning a Presidential election in our country. I think a good number of our countrymen may refuse to do because of religious or racial bias.

Mari said...

if obama fails to deliver during his term, the republicans might regain control again. that is, if he fails.
mccain's loss is attributed to a lot of factors, the financial crisis, his VP pick and being a close ally of bush. i reckon that lot of people voted for obama on the ground that the financial mess, the ongoing war, etc. etc. happened under the bush administration.

Photo Cache said...

I love this "shooting from the heart" post. It was this "bigotry" and narrow-mindedness that has soured me towards the republican party. I have always been an independent, but three years ago, I have taken that leap to register as a democrat because my views and values are echoed by the democrats.

But I have to say that I would have been swayed to vote for McCain under different circumstances. And if the Republican Party is going to put all their eggs in Sarah Palin's basket, their future is bleak.

Major Tom said...

It's clear that the GOp has just failed to catch up with the times and hold on to policies that are reminiscent of old politics, from McCarthyism to Cold War, failing to recognize the emerging new age mindset that's enveloping the world, unlike Europe which had responded so well. I doubt if they can ever rebound so swiftly from this defeat, it'll be a very hard climb back to White House.

rolly said...

Racism is borne out of arrogance bordering on ignorance. Or is it the other way around?AS far as I remember, racism is a folly of one race thinking it is superior over another. What a lot of crap and yet we find these bigots in high places of government. Too bad!

Panaderos said...

Mari,

From what I've observed in Mr. Obama, he seems to be a very politically savvy and pragmatic man. I am starting to think that he will do what's best for the country and will try hard to succeed given his place in history. Let's hope for the best.

As for the Republicans, they need to regroup and reassess what their priorities are. Objectively speaking, given their current attitudes and principles, it certainly looks like it will be many years before they win back the Congress and the White House.

Panaderos said...

Photo Cache,

I registered with the Republicans because I think their tax and economic proposals are more in tune with the realities of the global economy. However, I must admit that their other principles and policies fail to consider the changing face of America. A lot of their core beliefs, especially on matters of faith and morals, tend to be very uncompromising that they turn off a lot of moderates.

The Republicans need a lot of work and unfortunately, they will remain as a minority party for many years if they refuse to increase the size of their tent.

Panaderos said...

Major Tom,

I totally agree. It is going to take them many years to rebound from this particular defeat. They need to abandon their so-called "Southern Strategy" (their hold on conservative Southern state voters) and ultraconservative tilt to become a nationally relevant party again. They also need to present fresh, younger faces with fresh ideas before the American public warms to their party again.

Panaderos said...

Rolly,

People with such arrogant racist attitudes ought to be marginalized. Their attitudes should not be used as the basis of any party's policies or principles. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like the Republican Party is ready to drop those people from its base. If they continue to fail to do so, then they deserve to remain as the minority party for many years to come.

rdl said...

Great post!! I've been registered an Independent but don't think i've Ever voted Rep. and been thinking I should really just go ahead(and proudly) and change my affilition to Democrat. I really abhored the tactics that the Rep. used in the election. If Sarah Palin is the best that they have then they are surely in trouble.

Panaderos said...

RDL,

Sarah Palin remains loved by the conservative base. However, although she may have a bright future ahead representing the people of Alaska, I have my doubts if she'll be given another chance to run for national office soon. It'll probably take many years before she regains any credibility she may have lost with most of the electorate.

The Republicans truly need new faces and fresh ideas to revitalize their party. So far, I'm not hearing it from their leaders.