Monday, March 31, 2008

Professionalism

"Being a professional is doing the things you love to do, on the days you don't feel like doing them." - Julius Erving

Wise words from an NBA Legend. As professionals, we engage in an occupation or work as a means of livelihood or for personal gain. In the workplace, we are expected to always give our best, put our best foot forward, and put in an honest day's work. As professionals, we are then held to certain work and ethical standards.

However, we're also human and like every other human being, there are days and/or moments when we find it quite difficult to focus on the work or task before us. Instead of working on either a report or a presentation that's coming due, we find our thoughts wandering off, often to non-work related stuff. It may be due to a variety of reasons such as fatigue, an illness, or personal problems. As a result, we sometimes find ourselves either surfing the web or blogging. Sometimes we walk over to a coworker's cubicle to engage in some chitchat about the day's events or talk about any other topic under the sun except for work.

We may call those moments "mental breaks" or "recharging" but for some people, they will be quick to label those moments as "unproductive time" or "down time". Some would question our work ethic, call us "lazy", and some self-proclaimed moralists would even render a judgment on us by saying that we failed to put in an honest day's work.

Deep within, I must admit that it does bother me a lot whenever I get into such unproductive periods. My feelings are mixed at best. Although I do enjoy taking mental breaks, a part of me also laments the time lost in the process. A good part of my regret is also deeply personal. I view those unproductive spells as my failure to match my father's work ethic.

In all his years at work, I never saw my father open or read a newspaper while he was in the office, not even during lunch breaks. He would only bother to open and read the papers at night, once he was home. But while on the job, he was all work. He was all work from the moment he stepped in his office in the morning to the moment he packed up at night.

I was certain that the papers were never read in the office because they were still very neatly folded and looked as crisp and fresh as the moment they were placed on his desk earlier that day. That was the example he set for me and one I've always tried to live up to with varying degrees of success.

But like my father, I do value my job and I do take great pride in my work. I make sure that with every report I submit and every presentation I make, that I am well prepared and confident to respond to questions directed at me. I make sure that I have command of all the details necessary to support a position or a recommendation. The approach has so far helped me with my career.

But it is also my view that I would rather take a much needed mental break than submit a work product of questionable quality. But make no mistake. Deadlines do matter to me and I won't be caught dead missing any of them unless it was for factors beyond my control.

Looking back, I probably decided somewhere in my past to take an approach different fr0m my father's but to still strive towards the same end. The approaches we took were probably different because our personalities were different. Our life experiences were different too. All his hard work and sacrifices, some dating back from his childhood, did make life a little more comfortable for me and my sister.

Using Mr. Erving's definition of a Professional as the benchmark, maybe I am less of a professional than my father. However, if his definition of a Professional was based on the quality of one's output, maybe I have a fighting chance.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

A "123" Book Tag

I asked Dr_Clairebear if I could volunteer for this one because I think it's such a fun tag. I'm glad that she was quite supportive and agreed. :D The following are the tag rules and they're quite easy to follow and do:

1. Pick up the nearest book of at least 123 pages.
2. Open the book to page 123.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the next three sentences.
5. Tag five people.

The book I picked up that was nearest to me was titled "The 9 Steps to Financial Freedom" by renowned author and financial management guru, Suze Orman. Ms. Orman became famous in the US in the late 90s for offering people advice on how to save and where to invest their hard-earned money. Unlike other financial authors who tend to just dwell on the technical side of financial management, aside from the technical aspects of investing, Ms. Orman also adds a philosophical and spiritual bent to money management.

This book was, and still is, a huge influence on me as far as managing my financial affairs are concerned. There are a number of passages in the book that help put things into perspective. It so happened that when I turned to page 123 of this book, the following three sentences (per the tag rules above) provide a very good example of the type of message she imparts to her readers:

"The third way to make money is the most powerful and respectful way there is, and that is to invest the money you save during your working years wisely, so that when you no longer want to or are able to work, your money will work for you. The earning years of your retirement money can go on forever--money is a living entity, remember? If invested with respect, if invested in time to let it grow, these earnings will take care of you well and go on to take care of those you leave behind."

According to Ms. Orman, there are basically three ways to make money. The first way is to work for it. The second way is to inherit it and the third way is to invest one's savings wisely. The above sentences also show that for Ms. Orman, the acquisition of wealth is not an end but a means to an end. In this book and in all her other books, she emphasizes that when it comes to decisions affecting money, we should always consider, above everything else, how those decisions affect the ones we love.

For this tag, I'm tagging the following people: Mari, Em Dy, Gizelle, Fingertalks, and BW. I hope you guys won't mind. Thanks in advance for participating.

Photo credits: SuzeOrman.com

Friday, March 28, 2008

Saturday Photo Hunt

This Week's Photo Hunt Theme: High

This is a shot of the west side of midtown Manhattan taken from one of our office windows. The landmark on the left is the famed Empire State Building. This is my first contribution to the Photo Hunt effort and I'm posting it a few hours early.

Have a great weekend.

Original Photo by: Panaderos

A Technorati Tag

This is the other tag from Gizelle that I'm addressing for this post.

I have randomly selected the following five people: Lazarus, Bambit, Rudy, MegaMom, and Dr_ClaireBear to be tagged. I hope that you will similarly publish this post on your respective blogs. The tag rules mandate that you tag 5 other bloggers and to just keep adding to the list. No replacements, just additions.

Tag others and see your Technorati Authority explode. Please let me know if you wish to participate so I can email you the code. (Yes, there is a code. Hehe) Thanks in advance to all of you.

And these are the people who already took part on this tag:
*Blognation, Pinoytek, Reyna, Bluep, Kotsengkuba, Buraot, Iris, KCee, Banco De Reyna, Mitch, Melai, Malen, Beng, Sasha, Divaness, Jojitah, Joanjoyce, Gzel, Panaderos, (you!)

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The "Strategist" in the Baker

Click to view my Personality Profile page

I took a personality test earlier today at the request of my buddy, Gizelle. So off I went to the mypersonality.info site. The test I took classified me as an INTJ or "Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, and Judging", a personality type that is also known as "The Strategist".

INTJ persons were described as: introspective, analytical, determined persons with natural leadership ability. Being reserved, they prefer to stay in the background while leading. Strategic, knowledgable and adaptable, INTJs are talented in bringing ideas from conception to reality. They expect perfection from themselves as well as others and are comfortable with the leadership of another so long as they are competent. INTJs can also be described as decisive, open-minded, self-confident, attentive, theoretical and pragmatic.

Sometimes people perceive me to be a bit aloof ("suplado") but it's because "To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how." - INTJ Profile

Lastly, according to the Portrait of an INTJ, "INTJs are natural leaders, although they usually choose to remain in the background until they see a real need to take over the lead. When they are in leadership roles, they are quite effective, because they are able to objectively see the reality of a situation, and are adaptable enough to change things which aren't working well. They are the supreme strategists - always scanning available ideas and concepts and weighing them against their current strategy, to plan for every conceivable contingency. "

The downside to this is that INTJs were estimated to make up only 1.5% of the population. It tells you therefore that my dating prospects are quite limited. Hehehe

Gizelle, if you won't mind, I'll respond to your other tag tomorrow. Thanks.