This entry focuses on the Divorce question in the Philippines. Divorce is one of those issues that the Philippines has not gotten around to implement due to a combination of strong Catholic traditions and strong Church influence on national affairs. In my own little way and through this little blog, I would just like to add my voice to the thousands (and hopefully millions) of Filipinos who are crying out for a smart and reasonable government policy on marital dissolution. I do not find it necessary to post the provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution that supposedly forbid the legalization of divorce. Google is readily available for that. However, what I am going to do is discuss my reasons and my stand as to why Divorce should be legalized in my dear country.
First of all, I find it lamentable that the principle of separation of Church and State is gradually being weakened in Philippine political life. Back in the day (both pre-martial law and martial law years) when the two-party system was in place, there was only one religious group that voted as a bloc, the Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC). Though politicians courted the INC's vote, their numbers, as a percentage of the Filipino population, were not big enough to significantly dictate or influence national policy.
Today, we have a multi-party system in place where no single political party commands a clear majority in Congress. As a result, the Filipino electorate has been spliced and diced so many times over to the point that these days, not only do we have an INC vote, but we also now have an urban poor vote, the left-wing vote, the Muslim vote, the military vote, and the Catholic vote, to cite a few examples. The Catholic vote has even been split further between the traditional Catholic and the El Shaddai factions. It is political niche marketing at its best, albeit with potentially disastrous repercussions.
The splintering of the political parties and the Filipino electorate had the unfortunate result of unduly increasing the influence of the Catholic Church on the country's political affairs. Thanks to the current President's lack of political spine, the Church has been allowed to infringe on government policy. I watch with alarm as the Church's influence on our lives has grown to the point that it now has an indirect say on what movies we can watch, how many children we can have, when and for what reasons are we allowed to have sex, and why the State should continue supporting a policy that would permanently trap couples into a loveless and, oftentimes miserable, marriage. In a lot of ways, it seems that the Spanish Friars are back in town except this time, their skin is brown.
Here is a plain and simple truth. Not all Filipinos belong to the Roman Catholic Church. Not all Filipino Roman Catholics hear Mass. And of those who do attend Mass regularly and actually listen to the homilies, I believe that it is safe to say that not all of them subscribe to the Church's views on birth control.
On a personal level, my parents consider themselves as devout Catholics. However, when it came to matters such as birth control and family planning, they parted ways with the Church. Being an outcome of an unsuccessful attempt at birth control, I asked them one time why this was so. Their response was that when it came to sex, they saw no reason to listen to the lectures and to be faithful to the rules being set by someone or a group who supposedly abstains from it. If they can't do the walk, why listen to them talk? Religion served as a spiritual guide, not a practical reference. I don't believe that their view is unique for I am pretty confident that millions of intelligent and responsible Filipino couples feel the same way.
I also do not share the view of some anti-divorce activists that legalizing divorce would encourage family breakups. I strongly disagree. Imposing a total ban on divorce is tantamount to a denial that family breakups occur. The current absence or lack of divorce/annulment statistics prevents our country from obtaining a clear and objective picture of the state of the Filipino family. Is it a wonder then that in the absence of such statistics/information, intelligent government policy and laws that would oversee the breakup of a family are pretty much non-existent in our country?
Yes, we do have marital annulments in our country. The Family Code allows a marriage to be annulled if it can be proved that one party was "psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations of marriage." In this case, what constituted "psychological incapacity" was based on Canon law. Examples of psychological incapacity included homosexuality; lesbianism; emotional immaturity or irresponsibility; criminality; satyriasis; habitual alcoholism; and epilepsy. (Can you believe that last one?)
However, the problem with the annulment process is that it is quite onerous to the average Filipino. It can be quite costly as it usually requires spending hundreds of thousands of pesos. However, spending that amount of money does not guarantee a successful conclusion. Other factors could also come into play and affect the outcome such as the attitude of the presiding judge. Does the judge have a conservative/liberal bent? Is the judge rabidly pro-family or one who realizes the realities of life and marriage?
The process could also drag on if the other half decides to contest the annulment. Appeals, if any, could also cost quite a bit of money and could drag on for years. As is the case with the original lawsuit, there is also no guarantee that an appeal would succeed. Thus, given the odds against them, a lot of couples in loveless marriages are then left with no recourse but to either live apart but stay married in name only or stay together and make their lives and those of their kids a "living hell".
What do we say to a battered wife who suffers daily at the hands of a physically and/or psychologically abusive husband? What do we say to a husband/wife who toils overseas but whose hard-earned earnings are being misspent by a cheating spouse? What do we say to a wife whose children are being sexually molested or emotionally abused by a husband? How many times have we heard of single mothers who work hard to support their children without any help from the husband? How many families do we know off where one spouse just ran off with another partner and left the family to fend for themselves? What do we say to the kids who are emotionally abused in a loveless household? What do we say to these victims? Do we just tell them, "Sorry guys, that's the hand fate dealt you. Deal with it."?
We do not have to agree with Divorce to support its legalization. I strongly disagree with people who equate advocating the legalization of divorce to a disrespect for the sanctity of marriage. That's a very narrow and simplistic view in my humble opinion. Offering divorce as a legal option is an acceptance of a social reality. Not all marriages work. People, being human, commit mistakes everyday. And sometimes, mistakes are made in choosing a partner for life. For those people who are in failing marriages, the laws should provide one or both of the people involved a way out; an option to start over.
Divorce does break up a family. There's no debate about that. However, it is not and should not be viewed as the cause of a marital breakup. The Divorce process gives people an option to start over; the chance at a new and hopefully, better life. The process is not and should not be limited to marital dissolution. Though Divorce puts an end to a marriage, it does not let one spouse off the hook, so to speak. There are consequences to a divorce due to the fact that the divorce process also decides on areas such as child custody, spousal support or alimony, child support, child visits, and a fair and equitable redistribution of a couple's assets. I strongly believe that this process is a much better and humane alternative for it protects a family's well-being. That alone makes it a much better option than breaking up a family through abandonment.
The absence of a reasonable Divorce law/process is another one of those signs that we live in an unjust society. Its continued absence denies people one of their basic rights: the right to be happy. We can't call ourselves a genuine and respectable democracy if we continue to stigmatize and ignore the plight of certain sectors of our society through the absence or lack of a coherent national policy. We are all Filipinos and all laws should equally apply to all of us. No law should favor one sect over another.
From an economic standpoint, a happy person is a very productive person. If our society is to move forward economically, we need to do so with all engines running. So please, let us have a sober and mature discussion about Divorce and come up with a way to finally implement it.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
On Philippine Divorce
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Diseño por headsetoptions | A Blogger por Blog and Web



19 responses:
Those anti-divorce groups are either blind or stupid not to see that, even without divorce in this country, the statistics of family break ups is increasing tenfold.
Hay nako, this country has never gotten out of its colonial past. The hacienderos and the prayles still rule the roost. Is it any wonder why we're forever stuck in the rut?
the government is deaf about this issue. i don't think that the bill will be passed at all.
annulment is a lengthy process and indeed expensive. you also have to deal with corrupt judges, absent judges, red tape, etc.
psychologist's fees would range from 15k-60k. minimum lawyer's fees = 100k. other fees would include appearance of the psychologist in court, filing fees, etc. it'll literally drain your pocket. now, if you are a single parent and raising kids alone, you'd rather forego of the thought of filing for an annulment.
there are other options though. one can migrate to a country that recognizes divorce and file it from there. there's a certain jurisprudence that relates to this issue. i was told that the philippine government will honor the divorce if and only if, the plaintiff is a naturalized citizen of the adopted country. i'm not privy to the mechanics of this procedure. so, it's better to seek legal advice to illuminate the issue of filing divorce in another country.
so much for that.
hey mr. baker!
why in the worls did i ever think you were a female? hemingway, this post hits close to home for me. I strogly agree that divorce should be an option for filipinos. i am a rpoduct of a broken marriage and 24 years after my parents split, they are still married bacuse annullmet is so expensive and such a laborious process.
i am in the process of getting a divorce myself. i can only pray that mine would go as fast and as painless as possible.
peace.
it's hard to veer from the clutches of colonial past where the Church says and the people do. the same attitude is burying us into the pits.
it's the same reason why some people keep mistresses here, there and everywhere.
but those with money can expedite their annulment...hmmm. other opt to marry abroad and go back to divorce or annul. in the phils. one is stuck with the other till death do they part. hideous for those living incompatibles.
it's sad but no one is listening to legalise divorce in our country.
There's a lot of wisdom in what you've pointed out bro but I think Pinas isn't quite ready for divorce until the Pinoy frees itself from the strong grip of the the church.
I predict that the Pinas divorce system if ever it becomes a reality will be more forgiving than North American system because we Pinoys are by nature a more forgiving people.
I support divorce in Pinas but Pinoy style, not the highly inconsiderate, materialistic and destructive North American sytle, where the one who has more money to pay the lawyer gets everything and leaves one party a pauper.
Rudy,
That's our biggest problem. We still haven't shaken off our colonial influences. No small thanks to the Catholic Church, the old mentality is still very much with us.
Mari,
That's the problem with a government that moralizes instead of governs. Options and support systems should be made available to couples who want to dissolve their marriage. Marital breakups happen. We should not have to leave the country just to dissolve a marriage.
Hi Jane,
No, I'm not a woman. Hahaha Let me be clear about that. :)
Anyway, divorce should be offered as an option and the government should not make the process so burdensome. A man and a woman have the right to enter into marriage and they should also be granted the right to end it if they so desire. The focus ought to be in giving the people another chance at happiness and a better life.
Thank you very much for the visit and I hope your divorce proceedings conclude to your satisfaction.
Hi Ipanema,
Sad to say but Religion also breeds hypocrisy, lots of it. The same politicians who go on tv and on the radio rallying against the passing of a divorce bill are often the same ones who engage in extramarital affairs.
Yup, no politician is listening because they're all afraid of incurring the ire of the powerful Filipino Catholic Church. They'll definitely lose votes because the Church will use the power of the pulpit to make sure that any politican who dares go against the its teachings will be voted out of office.
bw,
I won't mind if we come up with an approach to divorce that's uniquely Filipino. I'm perfectly fine with that. All I'm after is that couples who are trapped in loveless marriages be given the option to end their marriage and start anew.
The annulment process we have now is awful and because of the costs involved, tends to favor the wealthy. A just divorce process should not be costly and the proceedings should not be lengthy.
You are 100% right.
It is a vicious circle.
People are poor so they are very religious, that makes the Church powerful and the politicians are afraid to loose votes.
I don't think it will change quickly. It will only change if the living condition of the majority of Filipinos improve dramatically.
When you have NOTHING your only hope is GOD.
And this is perfectly human behavior. Once everything goes wrong with me, I also have the tendency to turn to God to ask for mercy and for a solution...
I agree with BW's POV that divorce tweaked according to the Pinoy lifestyle would be an appropriate option for failed marriages. It is about time too because the
(im)morality level in this country is going to the pits. You're right legalizing divorce won't necessarily cause break ups but instead help alleviate the burden of being stuck in a marriage that no longer works to the benefit of both concerned parties to the detriment of the children.
Sidney,
You're right about how poverty and hardship have a huge influence on one's faith. Unfortunately, the Filipino Catholic Church thrives on that. It's been consistently against any government policy (e.g. birth control) that could help improve the poverty situation.
Hi Daphne,
From the system we now have, it tends to promote a value system where a spouse is forced to tolerate or live with the extramarital affairs of a cheating spouse. Having Divorce as an option would force both parties to at least consider the consequences of their actions. One can still cheat but it sure is going to cost him/her a lot if his/her partner decides to file for divorce.
That would be much better than the current system where, apart from a social stigma, there are really no consequences for a cheating spouse. There are no court decrees that would bind a father/mother to provide support for his/her children and his/her ex-spouse. For me, that's an outrage.
precisely what i've been harping about. there is double-standard as these people have no legal means to end a sour marriage, so they are putting up 'small houses' somewhere.
sad.
Instead of plotting to unseat or impeach the President, our do-nothing Congress should focus its efforts on revisiting all laws that impact the Filipino family. A lot of our laws that impact the family, such as division of property, inheritance, and marital dissolution to name a few need to be reviewed and updated to ensure equal treatment of the sexes.
You know what, i'm actually not a divorce fan for the Filipinos, believing that this option would make it easier for married couples to walk away from their marriages... but I get that my lack of support for it stems from a fear (or belief) that we are a people who are not good with responsibilities but are good in exploiting everything that will make life 'convenient' for us...
our laws need a lot of tweaking... and if i'd be allowed to be more honest, i'd actually prefer that they change the double-standard first on issues of concubinage and adultery...
and i really appreciate your views on the matter... as am realizing some things :)
Hi Mec,
I understand your fear and it is a very valid one. However, whatever the reason/motivation for filing for divorce is a matter of conscience. Like everything else in this world, divorce is open for use or misuse and sometimes, even abuse. It all depends on the person who decides to resort to it and it is going to be a matter between him and his god.
You did cite very good examples of laws that need tweaking (concubinage and adultery). Our laws in these areas are ridiculously outdated and need to be revisited. How I wish that we had a Congress that has the spine and will to tackle such issues.
To Mec> Even if they do succeed in tweaking the law it still won't solve the problem. It is for me, a palliative at best. There are deeper issues involved here.
Post a Comment